5 tests for Brexit

Yesterday, in a style oddly reminiscent of Gordon Brown, Prime Minister Theresa May set out five tests for a Brexit deal:

  1. It must respect the referendum result.
  2. It must be a lasting accord.
  3. It must protect jobs and security.
  4. It must be “consistent with the type of country we want to be as we leave: a modern, open, outward-looking, tolerant European democracy”.
  5. It must strengthen “our union of our nations and our people”.

 

Here are the tests she should have set (with thanks to Sam Lowe @SamuelMarcLowe):

  1. Does it keep the Irish border invisible?
  2. Does it leave us better off, or worse off, than if we had remained?
  3. Does it strengthen, or weaken, our international standing?
  4. Does it leave people free to work and live where they like across a continent?
  5. Does it fix the problems we face?

 

Notes to AM – Resignation

12th May, 2010


Labour’s Love Lost


I would not trivialise your demise dear bro

with half-baked bons mots about that day or this

but I will say


What stunned me

– in the back of the car

crossing town for that brutal farewell –

what slapped me in the face

(and does today)

was the way

the world despite calamity carries on

oblivious.


There was your name

in bold blunt prison

behind Ham & High wire mesh


searing


and yet

the impudent business of living

– bastards standing at bus-stops –

went ridiculously on

as if any meaningful bus could ever –


a girl on her mobile

laughing

laughing?

another, taking leave, hand on hip, of a guy,

skirt stretched, one heel braking her wheeled suitcase

going somewhere


as if going somewhere

still meant anything

when we now know it’s just

going ridiculously on.


And later, when Downing Street called

it’s not that I wasn’t grateful

it’s that it was too late for prime ministerial tea

and sympathy to sugar the shock of earth’s outrageous turning

(he’s gone, by the way, I meant to say, your decent friend,

just yesterday, with two bonny lads and some dignity).


Of the numbing fractured kaleidoscope of that day’s images

one alone spoke sense:

Closing Down Sale

acknowledging as it did

resignation

acknowledging as we must

passing

heydays’ ebb and heydays’ flow

and look, here’s one again, on Oxford Street,

Everything Must Go.









Nick Clegg’s argument

27 April, 2010


1. If nobody wins the election outright, I might hold the balance of power.


2. If Labour and Gordon Brown come third, they will have “lost the election spectacularly”.


3. It would not be legitimate for anyone who had lost spectacularly to run the country, therefore I could not work with Gordon Brown.


4. However I could work with Labour, even if they had lost spectacularly – as long as I can choose the leader.


No smoke-filled-room power-broking for Nick Clegg, then.


Only fresh, new, principled politics.